How a liberal learned to respect conservative thinking and accept the fact that, yes, the right is happier than the left By Catherine Caldwell-Harris Photo by Jessica Scranton What It Means When You Dye Your Hair Purple Should a something information technology specialist, by all accounts a competent employee, be able to dye her long, wavy brown hair purple without getting grief from management? That question was at the heart of the conversation at a recent dinner for a group of intelligent and age-diverse women. Download the complete MP3
This page is part of a much larger site on conscious evolutionhuman diversitywise democracyand more These two views are: Given the tremendous evidence on both sides, perhaps it might be useful to consider a third thesis that embraces both of them: People in general have been genetically endowed by evolution with a wide variety of tendencies and capacities that respond to -- but are not necessarily controlled or determined by -- their environment.
Perhaps our task is to use our powers of consciousness, intelligence, and choice to explore the full range of who we are and can be in various circumstances, aiming both to accept our whole selves and to co-create more life-serving, meaningful and joyful ways of being together.
For example, elementary teacher Jane Elliott did a famous experiment in in which her young students behaved -- with unexpected intensity -- according to her assumptions about how bright and competent they were.
One day brown eyed kids were smart and blue eyed kids stupid, and the next day the opposite. Her results suggest that in many circumstances our assumptions about each other have a profound effect on which aspects of us show up in the world.
And this is only a small piece of what is going on within us and among us. We have much more to learn about this and other dynamics if we wish to consciously and wisely engage our full evolutionary heritage as humans.
We could also develop evolutionary versions of political philosophies like liberalism, conservatism, anarchism, libertarianism, and communitarianism.
Each of these worldviews invokes key facets of human nature that other philosophies downplay or disparage. Since, from an evolutionary perspective, all facets of our humanity have a certain functionality under particular circumstances, evoutionary reframings may allow for integrating these embattled ideologies into more inclusive, holistic, and benign political worldviews.
We just need to live into being the people and societies we know we need to be.
For a list of evolutionary science books on human nature, click here. In particular, he says, we can learn as much about human evolution and behavior by studying the sensitive, peace-loving bonobo as by studying the more violent chimpanzee -- both of which share more than 98 percent of our DNA.
For this enlightening interview, click here. For more on bonobos and other primates, see these Nova pages:Below is an essay on "Humans Are Not Born Bad Or Evil" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
(Some) people are good and some are not so good; some do bad things to other people and behave badly generally, while other people behave well and treat people well.
Two Ways. There are two ways for people to get along in this world.
One looks like this. And the other looks like this. In the first, one person is above the other, . Are people born innately good or essentially evil? Do we have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society or a basically bad nature that is kept in check by society?
It’s a fundamental question that has been debated endlessly. Try Our Friends At: The Essay Store. Free English School Essays. We have lots of essays in our essay database, so please check back here frequently to see the newest additions.
Contrasting Evil and Good in Macbeth - In this essay I will look at the ways that Shakespeare has contrasted evil with good in his play Macbeth.
The United States Social Security Administration defines Generation X as “those born roughly between and ; Another federal agency, the U.S. Department of Defense, sets the parameters at to ; George Masnick of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies sets the Baby Buster years at to ; Primarily, generations stem from shared experiences.